Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.45r
[All images of this manuscript are from Digital Scriptorium]
Skimming through the Digital Scriptorium images this summer my interest was piqued by MS 288, a Book of Hours whose first text (after the calendar) has a rubric which mentions the Duke of Burgundy and provides the scribe's name, Dominic of Burgundy:
|Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.14r|
[Source - All images from Digital Scriptorium]
"Oracio domini ducis / Burgondie. que debet / dici cothidie. et est val/de devota et pulcherri/ma. et est scripta per manus Dominici de / Burgondia sui primi / philozophi. et est talis". Searches for the prayer's incipit, "Domine sancte pater omnipotens eterne deus qui Enoch et Helyam ...", have been fruitless, suggesting that this prayer is at least rare, and potentially a unique composition for this manuscript.
The verso of the same leaf, with the continuation of the prayer, contains a big surprise.
|Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.14v|
"Libera / famulum tuum Philippu(m) / ducem Burgondie et / Brabancie. Comitem Fla(n)/drie etc. Dominam duciss/am eius uxorem. etiam / dominum Karolum comite(m) / de Charrolois eorum liberum //"'Philip, Duke of Burgundy and Brabant, Count of Flanders, etc.' must refer to Philip the Good (1396–1467); 'the Duchess, his wife', is Isabella of Portugal (1397–1471); and 'Charles, Count of Charrolais, their son', was the future Charles the Bold (1433–1477).
These identifications give a broad date for manuscript: it must post-date Charles's birth in 1433, and pre-date Philip's death in 1467, when Charles assumed his father's title as Duke of Burgundy. San Bernardino of Siena, who was canonized in 1450, occurs in the Calendar (20 May), narrowing the possible date-range to 1450-1467; this is in accord with the style of illumination. The style of the creatures that inhabit the border at the beginning of the Hours of the Virgin, especially the second one below, remind me of creatures that inhabit borders illuminated by Lieven van Lathem, who worked for the Dukes of Burgundy in the second half of the 15th century:
Based on the text of the prayer quoted above, it is not clear for which of the three individuals the prayer was written (it could have been written for Charles, for example, who would have been expected to pray for his parents). A sceptic might argue that it was written for a devoted courtier, who would pray for the ducal family instead of himself. But I think that the continuation of the prayer makes the intended supplicant more certain:
|Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.16r|
"[...] Inclina be/nignissime pater aurem / tuam ad preces nostras / et aperi oculos tuos libe/ralissime deus super nos / Extende manum tuam / ad precem meam. et rele/va dulcissime deus om(n)em / necessitatem duci famli [sic] / tui Philippi ducis Burg(on)die / et tocius status et sue pa/trie ab omnibus impedi(men)tis."This leaves little doubt in my mind that the prayer was composed to be read by Philip himself, and almost all remaining doubt is removed by the text of the prayer Obsecro te, which includes, in addition to the usual anonymous initial "N" (for nomen), the extra initial "P":
|Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.31v - detail|
|Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.208v - detail|
|Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.211r - detail|
|Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.182v - detail|
"Rege quesumus domine / famulos tuos duce(m) n(ost)r(u)m / atq(ue) ducissam Burgondie et / liberum eorum ..."This is simply a version of a prayer that occurs elsewhere as a prayer for an archbishop and king:
|Northampton, MA, Smith College, MS. 288, fol.92r|
In the next post I will outline this manuscript's later history.
 The term "philosophus" puzzles me. Latham's Revised Medieval Latin Word-List, gives an instance of its use to mean "teacher" in c.900. Dominique Vanwijnsberghe, who kindly read a draft of this blog-post and made several very useful suggestions, pointed out it is also listed in Du Cange as referring to a school-masters who were also ecclesiastics. Dominique also suggested that the word might perhaps be used to refer to a physician (an idea I find plausible, as physicians were also sometimes astrologers, and astrologers were sometimes referred to as philosophers), and he thus suggested this identification: